All posts by h716a5.icu

No bite, no contest

The uncharacteristically flat track in Galle led to a snoozefest which denied Sri Lanka a chance of going 1-up at their most bankable venue

Andrew Fidel Fernando in Galle12-Mar-2013Small stretches of the Galle Fort’s walls are currently being restored, where wind, waves and time have weathered the original granite and coral construction. Builders have trucked in new rocks to replace the old, but they will hardly find a more hardy material to reinforce the fort than the pitch on which the first Test was played.It is usually said of Galle tracks that it already looks like a fourth-day surface on the second morning, but this time at close on day five, there was little observable change on the wicket to suggest more than two sessions had transpired. Sri Lanka declared their innings closed twice in pursuit of the unlikely, but in this Test, it seemed a travesty that bowlers can’t just choose to declare when they’ve had enough as well. It did not help that both umpires were reluctant to give batsmen out, not having the safety net of DRS, but perhaps even they cannot be blamed for dozing off.After the teams had agreed to call it a day an hour before the torture’s scheduled end, Angelo Mathews confirmed the exceptional batting conditions were at least partly due to a request made by the home team. “The management had a bit of chat with the curators, but they are professionals,” he said. “They have been doing this for the past so many years. We won’t poke our fingers, but we did have a chat.”Sri Lanka’s likely rationale for wanting a good pitch may have been to help ease an inexperienced batting order into Test cricket on a venue traditionally so bowler friendly that the previous four Tests didn’t go to the fifth day. They were not so much eased in, as sent flowers, soft toys and champagne by the ground staff. Sri Lanka will be encouraged that its top six batsman now all have hundreds to their name, but given the paucity of the challenge, most of their Test fifties will rate higher on their list of achievements.In requesting a good track for the young batsmen, Sri Lanka also seem to have forgotten that their attack has veered from modest to toothless in the past six months. Like a mechanic who inflates a flat tire but neglects the smoke pouring out of the engine, they have done their inexperienced bowlers a disservice and denied themselves the chance to taking a series lead at their most bankable venue. Even Rangana Herath, who averaged 20.30 in Galle before this match, and had two ten-wicket hauls in his last three matches there, was made to look no better than a part-timer, for all the turn he achieved.The placid conditions also add fuel to the wider question about whether home team advantage should extend to influence on pitch characteristics, especially when the cricket suffers. In December, India’s requests for turning pitches at home not only backfired in a 2-1 loss, but produced a dreary Test in Nagpur.”I wouldn’t say that it’s against the spirit of cricket to have a chat to the curators, because it’s home advantage after all,” Mathews said. “We would like to have wickets suitable for our team playing in Sri Lanka.”

The wicket was absolutely a road. The batsmen would have loved to bat next couple of days as wellAngelo Mathews

In 2011, the call to prepare an especially dry track for the visiting Australians, even by Galle’s standards, ended in the venue being officially warned by the ICC after the wicket had deteriorated drastically from the first day. Sri Lanka also lost that match, as the opposition fast bowlers exploited the extreme variables of bounce.Galle Tests have ordinarily been exciting, and the surface happily spin-friendly (as rich a contributor to the Test match landscape as Headingley, or the WACA ground), but meddling with its natural characteristics has now twice ended in disappointment for the hosts.”In a team perspective, we are very disappointed we couldn’t pull it off here, but I would say that it was tough. The wicket was absolutely a road. The batsmen would have loved to bat next couple of days as well. It didn’t spin at all, but the bowlers tried their best. It was just that the wicket didn’t give any sort of assistance. We batted one and half days and got 570 for 4. That says lot about the wicket.”With this year’s South Africa Tests having been postponed to 2015 and no home Test series until then, Galle will now take a two-year hiatus. For a venue that has brought bowlers so much joy, it is a shame its last match in a while had to be such a poor one.

'I have decided to return to my natural game'

Misbah-ul-Haq talks about his approach to the captaincy, the criticism he has copped for his defensive style, and the lessons from the drubbing in South Africa

Interview by Umar Farooq13-May-2013You are almost 40. As a cricketer, what does this mean for you?
My career has a lot of exceptions. I had a late debut in first-class and international cricket. Then the 2007 comeback, which was exceptional as it’s hard to come back at that age. So I don’t see age as a barrier in any way. I should be looking at how fit I am with regard to my endurance and performance. My body and mind are fully supporting me, and this is the reason I continue. It’s all about how comfortable a player is with his age.After the Sydney Test, you were almost done with your cricket career. Do you think you have been lucky?
It depends on how committed you are with yourself, and what you are willing to do for yourself. I was really disappointed that I wasn’t consistent with my performance, and was thinking of quitting. But it was tough to call it a day on such a poor note. I went back to domestic cricket, rediscovered myself, and realised that I still had the passion and the interest. So I decided to play and leave on a high note.There is a view that you deserve credit for bringing a much-needed calm to Pakistan cricket. How did you tackle the storm after the spot-fixing debacle in England?
Indeed [it was] a huge responsibility. It was a really difficult situation for Pakistan cricket. But it’s unfair for me to take the entire credit. Everyone played their role: the board, the coaching staff, and the new players. I was given a task to rebuild everything from scratch with a group that was new and inexperienced. But the results after all those debacles – in 2009 and 2010 – were incredible.The main driving force was the will to prove everyone wrong and regain credibility. Everyone was committed to moving on and starting afresh. As a captain it’s always important to be trusted. They not only trusted me but also played as a unit.Did captaincy transform you into a defensive player?
In 2007 my role in the team was a different one. As a No. 6 batsman, I was aggressive in the presence of Mohammad Yousuf and Younis Khan – who were taking most of the responsibility to play out all the overs and keep rotating the strike. But with Yousuf being dropped, it was a huge gap to fill, and the responsibility came on me. I was given a role when I led the team after the spot-fixing fiasco: to stay in the middle till the end. And this is the reason for the phase when I held my shots and didn’t play to my strengths. When you play like this, you lose your confidence and can’t give your best. But now I have given this approach a rethink and have decided to return to my natural game.I was more concerned about positive results. Whether I was defensive or aggressive, what was important was to win. It was important to get results.You were heavily criticised by the Pakistan fans for your approach. Do you feel a sense of siege with so much public scrutiny?
I understand people in Pakistan are very concerned about their cricket stars. These days cricket is being discussed and players are being analysed by everyone, irrespective of whether they understand the game or not. But as national cricketers, we are used to it. One must have belief in oneself. I do assess the criticism but also evaluate if there is any hidden interest behind it. If it’s a logical and fair point, I do consider it and try to address it on the field.So did you step down from Pakistan’s T20 side because of some criticism that you felt had logic?
I left for one simple reason: I wanted to give a youngster a chance to fill my place. Pakistan cricket needs more players in their set-up for the future. Their development is also important, and T20 is a format where you can easily try out a youngster. Once you identify a future prospect, you can try him out in the T20 format and then decide to pick him for Tests or ODIs.

“Asad Shafiq is a sort of player who can give stability to the middle order. He has got a sound temperament and is technically good, someone who can replace a player like Younis or me in the team”

Was it easy for you to step down?
Leaving any format of the game isn’t easy. Especially for me, since T20 was the format that had a significant impact on my career. In 2007 I made a name for myself because of T20. So it was a tough call, but I had to take a decision for the benefit of the team and future of Pakistan cricket. I continue playing T20 for the regional team and leagues but have no intention of returning to the Pakistan T20 squad.Do you think people expect you to take a charismatic approach to the game? Like [Shahid] Afridi…
Every player is different. In a team of 11, each player has his role. Not every player can bat with a strike rate of 150. Afridi has his own strengths but also has negative points. That’s the case with every player, including me. As a player you need to understand your game. If you go beyond the limits of your role, you are actually not doing what is good for yourself and for the team. You can’t always win by being aggressive.There is a persistent view that you are actually a defensive captain.
Maintaining a balance is very important. You have to be sensible enough to see the requirement. It is pointless to show unnecessary aggression, to attack when it’s time to absorb pressure and stay on the back foot. It’s a strategic thing that you have to manipulate according to the situation. And ultimately it’s the results that matter. When you are winning, there is no point in showing off with unnecessary aggression.Who would you want to pick out as your successor as captain?
At the moment I don’t think anyone is ready. In Pakistan we need someone who has experience, and we need to develop a player’s captaincy skills before handing him the responsibility. [Mohammad] Hafeez, in the meantime, has a strong case because he has ample experience of captaining various sides at the domestic level.Which player can develop into the most assured one in the team?
Asad Shafiq. He is a sort of player who can give stability to the middle order. He has got a sound temperament and is technically good, someone who can replace a player like Younis or me in the team. What are your thoughts on the future of Pakistan cricket?
Over the last two years things have been going well but Pakistan cricket has to lift its domestic structure. We can’t rectify the limitations and shortfalls without mending the structure. The current set of youngsters, and those who are coming up, is seriously suffering with no international cricket being played on home soil.The current lot has surely got talent but they are raw and things are moving very slowly for them. We can’t get them to raise their quality without playing international cricket in Pakistan. But given the circumstances, things aren’t that bad. Sure it’s a bit inconsistent but we have the X factor, and we always have a chance of beating any team in the world. So I am optimistic about the future.”Teams visiting South Africa are always uncomfortable and we knew what to expect. We should have grabbed the opportunity to go 1-1″•Getty ImagesFor many years, selectors have constantly changed the look of squads. For a captain how difficult is to lead a side with so many new faces in every series?
In the last five or six years we have lost so many established players in unexpected ways. Some retired, some were banned for match-fixing, and some went out of contention for reasons unknown. It’s not easy to replace players like Inzamam, Yousuf and Shoaib Akhtar.I agree that there have been changes in every series but we are in a transition and are trying out different players to get a good combination – which is obviously a drawback, as we can’t produce results consistently. There is a lot of fluctuation in our performances but it is natural. We played Tests with a mostly consistent line-up for two years and produced good results, but unfortunately we aren’t well settled at the moment. It takes time.How much longer do you expect to be with the Pakistan team?
I have not taken a final decision. I’m happy with my fitness, form, and most importantly, passion for the game. My body is responding to what I want it to do. Obviously I can’t be with the team all my life. But I haven’t thought of the long term. When I feel I am losing interest in cricket, I will think of parting ways.As a captain do you miss Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Amir? If they were in the side, would Pakistan be a better team than it is at the moment?
Indeed it was a blow. Amir and Asif were ruling while Butt was getting mature as a player. Replacing such players takes time. But in the end we have to rely on our available resources and plan for the future, hoping that they will give their best.Let’s not take away credit from those who rose in the time of despair and pessimism. We beat the world’s best team, England, and had a splendid winning record.What do you feel are the reasons for Pakistan’s chronic batting problems? You, as a captain have admitted often that the batsmen have made mistakes, and vowed to improve. But that never seems to have happened.
Behind the scenes you try hard to improve but at the same time you have to keep in mind the quality of batsmen we have. Most of the batsmen are young and haven’t played a lot of cricket. They lack experience. Of the six or seven regular batsmen, there are hardly one or two who have some experience. Even I haven’t played a lot of cricket. We don’t have star batsmen like most other teams. Nasir [Jamshed], Asad, Umar [Akmal] and many others are still young. They will gain experience with time.There is a view that you avoid personality clashes. Is this a reason for your success as captain?
I have always tried to avoid conflicts. After the [spot-fixing] fiasco, there was a need for stability and to avoid disputes at any level. Obviously every player has his own mindset and a captain needs to be flexible to deal with this. We needed solutions rather than leaving things unsolved and making them more complex.Pakistan was humbled in South Africa, losing the Test series 3-0. What do you have to say about this?
That was a really disappointing series. Teams visiting South Africa are always uncomfortable and we knew what to expect. We almost caught them by surprise in the second Test and that showed us that this side has the capability to turn things around. We should have grabbed the opportunity to go 1-1. We were flat and, no doubt, they were the better side playing at home.But in the end you learn a lot in defeats and I am sure this will help us in the Champions Trophy next month.Any regrets in your career so far?
A big no. I’ve always looked ahead and never tried to turn back. Sometimes things do get to you and you think about the past, but I have tried to make my future better rather than living in the past.

What's up with Watto?

Pilloried for much of the summer before playing a quite brilliant innings at its conclusion, Shane Watson had a funny old Ashes series

Geoff Lemon16-Sep-2013It was one of those golden days that a player may be lucky enough to have once in a career, where the world outside the ground slows to a hum, where every strike is crisp and clean as sliced apple, where everything falls solely to the benefit of a man standing still at the eye of his cricketing hurricane.As Shane Watson walked off The Oval late on the first day of the final Ashes Test, the Australian response to his 176 went three ways. Some soaked up the present, that moment when a cricketer was untouchable. Some wondered if this could be the making of Watson’s future. And a great many looked back, to the series lost and the patchiness of Watson’s career. “Watson and England both have achieved their first objective this morning,” wrote Australian journalist Greg Baum on Twitter. “He’s playing in Brisbane.”It was tongue in cheek, but referenced a very real Australian sentiment: that Watson is a liability, a source of trouble, a weakness for opponents to exploit. Two of the last four Allan Border medals for Australia’s cricketer of the year have gone to Watson. In the same period, he’s generated more home-grown antipathy than anyone. The narrative is of Watson as selfish, demanding and self-absorbed. As with most assessments of public figures, it leans less on evidence than conjecture.Watson is not helped by having one of the most expressive faces in cricket. On-field, there is always the sense he has just been dealt an injustice. Bowling, his hands fly to his head every other ball, mouth twisting into a lupine O. When hit, he looks aggrieved. Hitting a bowler, he looks righteous. Troubled by one, he looks seasick. Dismissed, he looks betrayed, shaking his head in lamentation at the cruelty. In one Test, edging toward slip, the stump mic picked up an agonised “Ohhh no!” before the ball had even hit the catcher’s hands. Watson knew what that edge meant, and the depths of his unhappiness formed a dark sea that lapped into our living rooms.The tradition of Aussie gruffness says he should pipe down and get on with it. And so we extrapolate: sooky, soft, preoccupied by his own fortunes. The desire to do well is never interpreted as concern for the team. His tortured path to his first hundred is tendered as further evidence. But to criticise Watson here is to forget Ashton Agar’s swat at Trent Bridge, Rogers’ painful crawl at Durham, Smith’s false bravado at The Oval. Added to the mix are genuinely thoughtless moments – publicly coveting the opener’s role while Ed Cowan tried to establish a Test career, marginal DRS referrals, frustrated threats of retirement.Confirmation bias is the filtering of information to support an existing opinion. In this way, negatives from Watson’s career accrue while positives are discounted. Partly the angst is down to simple volume of opportunity: he’s been in the national line of sight longer than anyone but Michael Clarke. Resentments become disproportionate as the cause persists; we’ve all lived with someone who raged over bin liners or the location of soap. Nor is the sentiment universal – disapproval is louder than satisfaction, unless it’s coming through a motel wall. But it’s not just personality. Attitudes to Watson exist not in spite of his talents but because of them.Australian cricket in my lifetime has always been seduced by the romance of the allrounder. Mostly it’s because we never had one. While I was in bunny jumpsuits, the firmament brought Imran, Kapil, Botham and Hadlee into alignment. Australia got Simon O’Donnell. Steve Waugh’s bowling ossified along with his spine while we cast envious eyes at Kallis. However great Australia’s sides, we were always six and four, straight up and down, the only kid at the party wearing a tie. Commentators circled back to Keith Miller, or in desperation, Dougie Walters. Even Mark Waugh’s best offspin or the haircuts of Colin Miller couldn’t replicate that unlikeliest thrill of cricket: a man who could make a hundred then bowl the other mob out.

Watson wasn’t the next big thing, he was Luke Skywalker. He was talked up by all the last big things. He also proved to have the structural integrity of Mr Potato Head

In this context, Watson wasn’t the next big thing, he was Luke Skywalker. He came along, blithe and blond, batting top four in the Shield and bowling straight-out fast. He was talked up by all the last big things. He also proved to have the structural integrity of Mr Potato Head. And so it began, a stop-start career that never let him settle. He’s been a bowler who slogs, an opener who bowls as cover, an opener who doesn’t and a middle-order lynchpin who can’t. His bowling retirements are like Johnny Farnham farewell tours. He’s managed to look invincible and incapable; his periods of dominance have never become eras.Jarrod Kimber brilliantly explored the Australian obsession with the “natural”: the ferocious talent who would sweep all before him. When a young Damien Martyn panicked in Sydney, 1994, he was made scapegoat for his team-mates’ failings. “Any hopes of him becoming a captain, a legend or even a 10-year player left once he showed in one innings that he was not the one. His papers were stamped ‘non legendary’.”Watson has been similarly processed publicly, for a career that couldn’t deliver on its entirely unrealistic promise. But in an era short on talent he is not so easily discarded, and frustration with his performance is not entirely fair. At Old Trafford I badgered Darren Lehmann on whether he saw Watson as a proper batsman. “What I do see,” said Lehmann, “is when you can play an extra bowler in your top six, it’s such an advantage… So as an allrounder, no dramas.”It was an important distinction. And on reflection, my thinking was shaped by an Australian era where Justin Langer was the batting exception for averaging 50. Clarke’s 52.08 is the only remnant of that time. Of 11 top-seven batsmen since Mike Hussey retired, the best are David Warner and Watson, who top 36. The rest range from 35 to 9.Even against great allrounders, Watson is only a run behind Imran and Miller, and between three and nine ahead of Botham, Kapil, Mankad and Hadlee. His ratio of innings exceeding 50 is the best of the lot, once every second Test, with Miller and Botham closer to one in three, Imran three and a half, and the others toward four and beyond. Of course he doesn’t bowl like any of them, averaging fewer than half the overs and wickets per match, but we’re talking legends of the game’s history.As the numbers settle, we find ourselves looking at a man who may not have made the best teams of his country’s past but is among the best cricketers in his country’s present. Those who admire him are less vocal than those who don’t. What has plagued his career is uncertainty, and it’s here that the real antipathy is born. Ricky Ponting was hounded into retirement because we couldn’t stand not knowing when he’d retire. Watson is hounded because we don’t know if, when, and in what capacity he’s going to deliver.While resentment manifests itself at a personal level, the bulk of its cause is not inherently personal. If Watson’s 176 – and his recent technical work on his lbw problem – can prompt a more consistent phase of his career, concerns about his wicket-taking face will begin to seem strangely less important.

Pace, bounce, quick runs, and Mitchell Johnson

Stats preview to the Perth Test, where England have lost each of their last six Tests

S Rajesh12-Dec-2013England haven’t beaten Australia in a Perth Test since 1978, and even that wasn’t worth a regular Test win as Australia’s main players were away doing Kerry Packer duty. Since then they’ve lost seven out of nine Tests, and each of the last six, at this venue; in those last six Tests here, they’ve averaged less than 21 runs per wicket with the bat and conceded almost 38 with the ball. Their last three defeats have been by margins of an innings and 48 runs (2002), 206 runs (2006) and 267 runs (2010). Given that England must avoid defeat to stay in the Ashes, these are not encouraging stats.Australia have been unstoppable here against England, but their overall recent results here aren’t quite as daunting, which is what Alastair Cook and Co will need to remember as they go into the Perth Test. Since 2006, Australia only have a 4-3 win-loss record here, with two defeats against South Africa and one against India offset by wins against England (twice), India and West Indies. In 2008, Australia lost twice in Perth: against an Indian team which was also trailing 2-0 in the series, they were beaten by 72 runs, while South Africa chased down a target of 414 for the loss of only four wickets later that year. Their most recent Test there also ended in defeat, by 309 runs against South Africa. In 2009 they beat a fairly ordinary West Indies side by only 35 runs, but that was followed by two emphatic results – a 267-run hammering of England, and an-innings-and-37-run win against an abject Indian team.In these last seven Tests, Australia’s batting average is only slightly more than their bowling average, but what’s worrying for England is how poor their batsmen have been in the last six Tests here. Only two centuries have been scored by them during this period – 123 by Graham Thorpe in 1995 and 116 by Cook in 2006 – and there are only two other scores of more than 75. England’s three top-order batsmen who’ve played Tests here – Cook, Kevin Pietersen and Ian Bell – have all got starts and a venue average of around 40, but none of them have imposed themselves on a match.Apart from their poor record in Perth, England also have the baggage of the series scoreline to play against. After being thrashed in Brisbane and Adelaide, England need to win two out of three Tests to retain the Ashes. Only once have England recovered from a two-match deficit and levelled a series against any opposition: in 1954 in the West Indies, England lost the first two Tests by 140 and 181 runs, but won the third and the fifth by nine wickets to draw the series.

Team records in Perth

Team (period)TestsW/ LRatioBat aveBowl aveAustralia (overall)4023/ 102.3037.1628.44England (overall)121/ 80.1226.6736.09Australia (since 1990)2315/ 53.0039.8126.85England (since 1990)60/ 60.0020.5937.72Australia (since 2006)74/ 31.3333.7529.51Australia’s top order hasn’t been outstanding here either. Michael Clarke has played 15 innings here but scored only one century – 135 not out against England in 2006. In his last four Tests here, Clarke has scored a total of 127 runs in seven innings, at an average of 18.14.

Australia’s current batsmen in Perth (Qual: at least 2 Tests)

BatsmanTestsRunsAverage100s/ 50sMichael Clarke851837.001/ 2Brad Haddin431144.420/ 3Shane Watson326243.660/ 2David Warner222274.001/ 0Mitchell Johnson520826.000/ 2When the venue is the WACA, the central topic of discussion is invariably fast bowling, but the table below shows that overseas spinners have performed as well as their fast bowlers in the last seven Tests. Among the overseas spinners, the left-arm ones have done pretty well: Monty Panesar took eight in the match in 2006, while Robin Peterson, Paul Harris and Sulieman Benn have all taken four or more in a Test. Among the overseas fast bowlers, Chris Tremlett had a superb game in 2010 with match figures of 8 for 150, while Dale Steyn has 11 from two Tests at an average of 24.90.For Australia, though, fast bowling has been by far their most potent weapon here: they’ve taken 114 out of 127 bowler wickets in the last seven Tests here, at an average of less than 26; spinners have gone for almost 60 runs per wicket.What’s also noticeable is the rate at which bowlers have conceded runs at this ground. Batsmen have often said that this is an excellent venue for run-scoring once a batsman has adjusted to the pace and bounce, and the stats confirm this: bowlers overall have conceded 3.51 runs per over at the WACA in Tests since 2006, the highest among venues which have hosted at least five Tests during this period.

Pace and spin in Perth since 2006

WicketsAverageStrike rateEcon rate5WI/ 10WMAus pace11425.6348.13.195/ 1Aus spin1359.7696.13.720/ 0Others – pace8833.4453.93.722/ 0Others – spin3432.0549.53.881/ 0Among the Australian fast bowlers, Mitchell Johnson’s stats in Perth stand out. In five Tests he has 36 wickets at an average of 19.66, and a wicket every 33 balls. At all the other venues, he averages 31.45, and takes a wicket every 57 balls. The fewest number of wickets he has taken in a Test here is five, while against England in 2010 he returned match figures of 9 for 82.The other bowler who destroyed England in 2010 was Ryan Harris, who had match figures of 9 for 106. He didn’t do too much in his only other Test, against India in 2012, but his Perth average is still an outstanding 15.72, at a strike rate of 32.7 deliveries per wicket.

Australian bowlers in Perth

BowlerTestsWicketsAverageStrike rateEcon rate5WI/ 10WMMitchell Johnson53619.6633.63.502/ 1Ryan Harris21115.7232.72.881/ 0Peter Siddle3830.7562.32.950/ 0Perth’s a pitch for fast bowling, but it isn’t usually a venue where teams prefer to bowl first: five of the last seven Tests have been won by the team batting first. The two instances when the team batting first lost the Test were Australia against South Africa in 2008, and India in 2012, when they were bowled out for 161 and lost by an innings and 37 runs. Overall in the last seven Tests, teams batting first have averaged almost 32 runs per wicket in their first innings, while the average has dropped to 25 for the second innings of the Test. It goes back up into the mid-30s for the last two innings.

Innings-wise average runs per wicket in Perth since 2006

1st innings2nd innings3rd innings4th innings31.6824.8435.9834.66

'We must make sure the culture of Test cricket stays'

Jacques Kallis on the health of Test cricket, the allrounder’s art, what South Africa’s Under-19s must do now that they’ve tasted success and how he plans to stay whetted for one-day cricket, in a free-flowing Q&A session at Newlands

Firdose Moonda in Cape Town02-Mar-2014’I want to remembered as someone who enjoyed the game. There are a lot of pressures and sometimes you forget to enjoy the game’•Getty ImagesI grew up not wanting to play for South Africa because we didn’t have international cricket at that stage. I wanted to play provincial cricket and that was what I was working towards. To suddenly be exposed to international sport, your goals change. It was a major changing point in my life. It afforded me the opportunity to see places, meet people, explore other things.Have you ever had a regret about retiring from Test cricket first, and have you missed it?
All good things do come to an end. The moment I had begun to lose a little bit of passion or I got a little bit tired, I’d have called it quits. Ideally, I would have liked to finish it at Newlands but everything happens for a reason. I have not missed it yet. I am still involved in the side quite a lot. I have been involved with the guys. We went on the camp before this series, in the bush. I still feel a part of it. Surprisingly, I have watched a little bit more cricket now than I did in my playing days. Life is a lot easier on the couch.Everyone has a favorite ground, what is it about Newlands that is so special to you?
What better ground is there in the world? You’ve got the mountain, you’ve got beautiful weather, you’ve got great facilities. I grew up wanting to play at Newlands, bunking a few classes to come and watch matches. It’s a magnificent place to play cricket. The crowds are always fantastic. They are always behind the guys. The memories play such a big role here.Favourite Newlands memory – double-hundreds or twin hundreds v India?
The [twins] were special to me, even though I had done it before. The way the game was positioned, if we got bowled out then, India could have won the match. To get to that second hundred to set the game up meant a lot. I’ve had plenty of games where I’ve got 30 or 40 and it has meant more to me than a hundred. To get our team to a position from where we couldn’t lose the game was nice.The 200 was also special. There had been a monkey on my shoulder to get one. Fortunately and unfortunately, I got one in Pretoria. [Later] getting it here, it was almost giving something back to Newlands.Pair to double-hundred v Sri Lanka… How did you turn it around?
I focus on my strengths and don’t worry too much about opponents. There are little things you pick up but you want to exert your game plan onto them and not step back and let them make the play. It was a little thing where my movement was a little late and I picked it up straight away [on the video footage]. That was all I needed to see. For the next week, I worked on being a little earlier. It’s little things at this level.How do you feel about comparisons?
I didn’t play the game for statistics. When you play this game you want to be as good a player as you can be and make decision that will benefit the team. I like to believe I got more right than I got wrong. There have been some magnificent players in yesteryear who didn’t play as much cricket as we did and some who didn’t get the opportunity to play at all. If they did and they had the opportunity and facilities that we have today, they probably would have achieved what I achieved and more.How do you intend to stay in good touch [having retired from one format]?
When I want to achieve something and put my mind to it, I want to give it everything I’ve got. I want to be part of a team that wins the World Cup. That’s something that’s missing on my CV. If I didn’t believe we could do it, I would not stick around for it. If I didn’t believe I could make a difference, I wouldn’t do it. We’ve still got 20-odd ODIs before the World Cup and if I am not scoring the runs, I have no right to be in that team. I’ve just sat down with Gary Kirsten and worked out a programme. Not playing Test cricket will give me time to work on one-day skills.Would you consider domestic cricket or a contract in the UK?
I would like to play as much as of the one-day cricket as I can going forward. It’s about getting the balance right.How do you get into your bubble?
I have the ability to go in and out of concentration and it applies to a lot of things in life. We spend six and half hours in the cricket field and you can’t concentrate for that long. I managed to find a way to concentrate for the five or six seconds when a bowler is at the top of his mark or when I am at the top of my mark. That’s the difference between the experienced guys and the younger guys. The younger guys sometimes make mistakes because they think they can concentrate the whole day. You have to learn to switch on and off.Administrative issues in the background of your career, how did you stop that from interfering with your game?
There were some tough times but we are also not silly as players that think it only happens to South Africa. There are issues all around the world. We don’t have a lot to do with what the board has to say and what they do and it doesn’t really directly affect the players. We had faith in the guys that were handling that sort of stuff, to handle it. We were there to play the game. Eventually it gets sorted out, sometimes not as quickly as players would have liked, but we also didn’t get the results the players would have liked. It works both ways.Your opinion on the BCCI’s growing power?
I don’t think anyone really knows if it’s a good or a bad thing. We are going to have to wait and see. If we are brutally honest, the BCCI has had a lot of power over the game for some time, so I don’t think it is really going to change much. My only concern is that they make decision in the best interests of cricket and not only in the best interests of the own cricket, and I think they will do that.

“I know I would not have achieved what I did if I couldn’t bat and bowl. I would get bored fielding in the slips all day.”Jacques Kallis on being an allrounder

T20 cricket v Tests?
Look at the turnout here. Test cricket is healthy. Test cricket is the ultimate. That’s what cricketers want to play. I don’t think there needs to be too many changes. There is some talk about night cricket but I am not a big fan of that, because I think conditions will change. We need to look after Test cricket.Having said that, there is so much money in T20 cricket, we can’t turn our back on it. The pace Test cricket is played at these days is probably twice the pace it was before T20 cricket. It’s opened up a new audience. But we mustn’t overkill it.Ideas to grow Test cricket?
The World Test Championship is a great idea for Test cricket. We need to focus as much attention and cash as we can [on Tests]. We need to make sure the culture of Test cricket stays. When I was growing up, we’d play the odd two-day game. I think it’s vital that we still have that and guys are exposed to a longer form of the game.Allrounders – is it a dying art?
My reasoning is [that is down to] the amount of cricket that is being played. There’s too much to bat and bowl. In South Africa, we produce allrounders because of the conditions. There’s always something in it for the batsmen and something in it for the bowlers. There are some great allrounders coming through. If you look at the history of the game, though, there hasn’t been that many that have really come through.I know I would not have achieved what I did if I couldn’t bat and bowl. I would get bored fielding in the slips all day.What is your legacy?
It’s about giving something back to the game. I don’t want to be seen as someone who just took from the game.I also want to be seen as someone who never gave up, no matter what the situation. It’s something we do as a South African team and we’ve done it a few times recently. There have been so many times when people have written us off and we came back.And I also want to remembered as someone who enjoyed the game. There are a lot of pressures and sometimes you forget to enjoy the game.Your opinion on this game [against Australia]?
Sometimes we give up home advantage. We maybe could have got a wicket that gave a little more. The Australians, when there is some sideways movement, they are not always comfortable. They are very good on a wicket like this. Sometimes we have to be clever with our home conditions.We are under pressure here, but this game is far from over. We are going to have to bat well. I have no doubt we can. A couple of years ago, we were in a similar situation and we bowled them out for 47. Stranger things have happened in this game and all three results are still possible.What is your advice to the Under-19s?
It’s a fantastic achievement [winning the World Cup]. Going into the final, they probably had that chokers tag on them. It just shows South Africans can win tournaments. It will give the national side a lot of pleasure.I learnt a great lesson when I started my career. My first six or seven Tests I scored virtually no runs and I doubted myself. Then I scored some runs and it taught me many lessons. I hope this success doesn’t make them think they’ve made it. Now the hard work starts. Don’t sit back and take it for granted.Your toughest opponent?
Seamer: Wasim Akram. He had the ability to swing the ball both ways. Spinner: Shane Warne. He controlled the game, he attacked, defended. Batsman: Brian Lara.Sachin Tendulkar?
He has done a tremendous amount for world cricket and for taking it forward. He played the game hard but always in the right spirit. To achieve what he achieved is incredible. I enjoyed my battles against him. I always said I will play this game hard but in the right spirit, that I can [leave aside] the game when I am in a country and have a beer with them. That’s the way he played it [too].Hashim Amla?
What a revelation he has been. I remember when he started people said he will never make it with that technique. It shows you what hard work can do. You take the hardworking guy over the talented guy. I’m not saying he is not talented but he also works as hard as everyone. When he gets out, you feel a shiver go down people’s spines. He is a complete player, he is difficult to bowl to, he’s got the guts and the determination.What are you going to do after cricket?
It has been nice to catch up with friends and family. That was the first thing I really wanted to do. My sister has recently got married and she is pregnant now, so its nice to spend time with her.My foundation will take up some of my time. I wont be involved too much in the game at the moment. Perhaps the odd commentary stint… Though, from a coaching and batting point of view, I would like to give back. I would always want to share the knowledge I have been given and learnt.

West Indies bring back their fear factor

The ultimate entertainers, West Indies now have the batting power to match the threat their fast bowlers brought in the 1980s

Alan Gardner in Chittagong01-Apr-2014West Indies may have a formula for T20, or they may just let it flow through them. Modern players often talk about going out on the field and expressing themselves but it appears to be only the West Indies team that truly do so, at least in this format of the game.Whether dancing to calypso, Korean pop or some local folk number, West Indies’ style has proved just as catchy as it was two years ago. The energy levels as they celebrated a sensational torpedoing of Pakistan were a little down on the party-hard reaction to beating Australia a few days ago, with just a few perfunctory giddy-ups for the cameras, but West Indies emanate conviction that their method is as sound as their arms are strong. With or without all the carry on, they are the World T20 entertainers.Darren Sammy has become as powerful a symbol of this as Chris Gayle and Marlon Samuels, stars of their triumphant 2012 World T20. Tony Cozier has written about his resurgence in the finisher’s role – innings in Auckland and Antigua, Barbados and Mirpur over the last few months underscore the point with all the emphasis of one of Sammy’s flat sixes – and here the captain gave another tingling display of his dead-eye death batting.As Saeed Ajmal, the premier spinner in this format, was crunched back down the ground in the 19th over, Sammy celebrated banishing the ball from his presence by pumping his fist back and forth, as if ramming home the metaphorical advantage. Ajmal had already gone the distance twice before, at the hands of Dwayne Bravo, who also belaboured Umar Gul – the second-most successful T20 bowler around – for consecutive sixes. Bravo was run out at the start of the final over but Sammy drove remorselessly on, thumping and jiving.Darren Sammy has proved to be a brutal force•Getty ImagesAsked previously about West Indies preference for dots over dash, sixes over singles, Sammy said it was just a natural inclination as to how to play the game. Suresh Raina belittled the approach, to which Sammy responded: “If he thinks we are only six-hitters, then stop us from hitting sixes.” India managed it, convincingly; Pakistan did not. Of West Indies’ 166 for 6, 51 came in singles, twos and a three; 106 flowed in boundaries.”In those situations, the best of them all go for runs,” Bravo said of the disdain with which Ajmal and Gul were treated. “We had nothing to lose, we were under pressure. So I said to Sammy, as long as we stay still, don’t worry about picking Ajmal or trying to rotate, just stay still, keep our eyes on the ball, we’re powerful enough if we get close to the ball to hit it over the ropes. Our aim was to get at least 135 to 140 with the start we got but the self-belief we have, the form and the power we have, the momentum went with us, we finished positive and got to 160.”The power of West Indies’ T20 batting – missing Kieron Pollard, too – has replaced the fear factor of their fast bowling in Tests 30 years ago. They use it to bludgeon opponents, intimidate them, shrugging off the chance to run ones and twos in favour of full-frontal assault. As with Samuels’ tinderbox innings in the final of the last World T20, this match reinforced the sense that they are rarely ever out of a game.From 84 for 5 at the end of the 15th over, Bravo and Sammy ran amok for another 82 runs from 30 balls. Perhaps the only way they could get better (other than jogging just a more singles) would be to implement a pre-War Test trick and reverse the batting order, somehow convincing Sammy to play each five-over block as if it were the last five overs – with the fall back of Gayle, Samuels and the rest to come in if he failed. Bradman would surely approve.”This is the first game that we lost wickets in the first six overs, so we were trying to consolidate but at the same time whenever we got a boundary we keep losing a wicket again,” Bravo said. “So in the middle overs, it calmed down. We’ve proved ourselves, in Twenty20 cricket we know how the game plays, if you take the game right down to the end anything is possible, as long as we don’t give up and keep faith and have that self-belief that if we bat 20 overs we’re going to get a decent total.”But we have to bat 20 overs, so at no point can we let what happens in the middle overs get the better of us, that comes with experience and self-belief. We still had Andre Russell and Sunil Narine to bat. It’s good we did not panic at 84 for 5 and take the game all the way down to the end. We showed in the Australia game what the difference can make as long as we have clean hitters at the wicket, so that’s our aim, that’s our strong point and we use it to the best of our ability.”Bravo, who is enjoying a purple patch in West Indies maroon, spoke of the team’s passion and enjoyment for the game, something else that Twenty20 has helped to resurrect in the Caribbean. “All West Indians are like that, we just want to entertain our fans, most of all the people of Bangladesh come out every game and support the tournament so it’s important that we give them their money’s worth,” he said. If West Indies’ manage to carry off the title again, it will be in the manner of all great entertainers: leaving us wanting more.

Guts key to spin bowling – Ashwin

R Ashwin believes the “guts” shown by the Indian spinners to flight the ball and overcome the fear of being hit in T20s has been the major factor for India’s success

Abhishek Purohit in Mirpur03-Apr-2014A legspinner tossing the ball high, giving it a rip with his wrist to lure the batsman out before getting it to dip, grip, turn and earning a stumping. An offspinner tossing the ball high, giving it a tweak with his fingers to draw the batsman forward, getting it to drift, grip, turn and earning an outside edge to slip. These are not dismissals you normally associate with Twenty20 cricket. But these are just two instances of what Amit Mishra and R Ashwin have been able to achieve in this World T20.Both spinners have had principal roles to play in each of India’s four successive victories in the group stage. On three of those occasions, they have not had the weight of runs backing them, as India relied on their preferred strategy of chasing. All three of those matches – against Pakistan, West Indies and Bangladesh – were ‘live’ ones, with qualification for the knockouts dependent on their results. Mishra was the Man of the Match against Pakistan and West Indies; Ashwin got the award against Bangladesh.Two subcontinent sides supposedly accustomed to playing spin, and a third which has backed itself to hit the big shots under pressure, and have done so in crunch matches against Pakistan and Australia. None of them managed even 140 against the Indians.The conditions have been spinner-friendly in Bangladesh, particularly so in Dhaka. MS Dhoni has said it has been one of the main reasons why the Indian slow bowlers have done so well. Ravindra Jadeja hasn’t been among them, though. It is not really his style to lure batsmen with flight and guile.But no matter how much the conditions support you, it takes tremendous heart for a spinner to bowl slow when the temptation is to fire it in quick. To overcome the ever-present fear of getting hit in T20 and toss the ball up. For one spinner to do it in a single T20 is itself remarkable. For two in the same XI to do it over the course of a world tournament with so much control is incredible. Ashwin, and particularly Mishra’s, biggest achievement this World T20 has been to consistently beat this fear, and do so without the security of a big total to defend every time it mattered.This absence of fear, or presence of “guts”, over four matches is what South Africa will be up against. It was a term Ashwin used several times ahead of India’s semi-final clash. “In terms of variation of pace, you need a lot of guts,” Ashwin said. “If you’re at the top of your game, you can land the ball exactly where you want it to land.But apart from that, to actually slow the ball down when the batsman’s going after you is a key component of this particular game, for which you need quite a lot of guts. And if you’ve gone for a six, it requires even more guts to come back the next ball. Those are the key components of a winning game, as far as I’m concerned.”It tells you a lot about a spinner’s state of mind when he says the ball is behaving as he wills it. “In the last two or three months, I feel that I’m probably at the top of my bowling game,” Ashwin said. “When I reach that phase, I pretty much don’t practice at all. That’s a phase I’m in right now. The ball is landing exactly where I want.”South Africa will have to counter Mishra and Ashwin on a helpful and unfamiliar surface – they have been playing in Chittagong so far – and that too in a knockout. Bowlers have not had to contend with heavy dew turning the ball into soap in Dhaka, like it did so often in Chittagong.South Africa have probably the most nerveless innovator among current limited-overs batsmen in AB de Villiers, and they will need to keep calm when it comes to taking on spin. South Africa also have the Super 10 stage’s leading wicket-taker in Imran Tahir, who’s managed 11 wickets in less helpful conditions with his mix of quick sliders and googlies.He’s had a well-publicised visit from Shane Warne in the Mirpur nets. Will he stick to what has worked for him in Chittagong, or will he use more flight and turn like the Indians have? Whatever method he uses, Ashwin said it would again come down to the same word – guts.”When it comes to international cricket, there’s a very small margin between the quality of spinners. Everybody’s bound to have a certain amount of quality in them. It’s all about the mental make-up of the spinner and the amount of guts he has in that particular scenario,” Ashwin said. “It’ll be handling pressure that makes the difference, because Imran Tahir has been in top form. And I expect (Aaron) Phangiso to play. When that happens, you’re pretty much evened out on the amount of spinners both teams will play. It comes down to how well your spinners handle it.”Apart from pressure, the spinners might also have to deal with a wet outfield, as rain is expected around the time of the match on Friday. The last time rain came down in an India game in a World T20, against Australia in 2012 in Colombo, it contributed to their exit from the tournament, as their three spinners found it difficult to grip the ball. Even Mishra and Ashwin, for all their heart, could struggle if it rains again.

Winning after 100-plus deficits, and Sangakkara's run-fest in 2014

Stats highlights from the fourth day in Galle, when Sri Lanka made a strong start in their chase of 370

S Rajesh19-Jul-2014110 – The largest first-innings deficit for Sri Lanka in Tests which they’ve ended up winning. There’ve been only two instances of Sri Lanka turning around 100-plus run deficits into wins, and both were in matches when they batted first and got out cheaply: against Pakistan in Faisalabad in 1995 they were all out for 223 and conceded a lead of 110, but won by 42 runs, while against England at Headingley last month they were bowled out for 257 and conceded a lead of 108, but won by 100 runs. 58 – The largest first-innings deficit for Sri Lanka in Tests in which they’ve batted second and won the game. That happened at the SSC in Colombo against West Indies in 2005, when the visitors batted first and scored 285, and then bundled out Sri Lanka for 227. In their second innings, though, West Indies were bowled out for 113, and Sri Lanka chased down 172 losing only four wickets. 1 – Number of times, since their readmission to international cricket, that South Africa have lost a Test match after taking a first-innings lead of more than 100. The only such instance was against Australia in Port Elizabeth in 1997, when South Africa scored 209 and then bowled Australia out for 108, but ultimately lost the Test by two wickets. (This excludes the Test when South Africa forfeited an innings against England in Centurion in 2000.)300 – The highest fourth-innings total in Galle, by Pakistan in 2012. They lost that Test by 209 runs.1018 – The number of Test runs for Kumar Sangakkara in 2014, in 13 innings, at an average of 92.54. He is the first to go past 1000 Test runs for the year – the next-best is Angelo Mathews with 693.87.93 – AB de Villiers’ strike rate in South Africa’s second innings (51 off 58 balls), which is the third-best among South Africans who’ve scored 50 or more in a Test innings in Sri Lanka.68.50 – The average partnership in a Test innings between Sangakkara and Kaushal Silva. In 11 partnerships, they’ve added 685 runs, with one century and five half-century stands. The last three partnerships (including this one) have yielded 97, 98 and 96 runs.8 – The number of wickets in the match for Dilruwan Perera, the Sri Lankan offspinner. It’s the first instance of eight or more wickets in a match for a Sri Lankan right-arm spinner in almost four years – the last such instance was in August 2010, when Suraj Randiv took 9 for 162 against India in Colombo.

Remembering Archie

Phillip Hughes’ death brings to mind the grief felt across Australia at the passing of brilliant, humble 23-year-old Archie Jackson 81 years ago

Greg Growden03-Dec-2014An electrical storm was about to hit Sydney. The clouds were swirling, darkening. Last Sunday afternoon, many did not venture outside. They had obviously looked out to the west, seen what was coming from over the Blue Mountains, and thought it best to stay under cover.Maybe that’s why the Field of Mars Cemetery in Ryde was near-deserted. Two women, walking a Jack Russell that was clearly irritated to be on a lead, were having a brief sit-down, leaning up against a palm tree. Two or three cricket pitches away, in the Methodist Section, was the only other person in the cemetery grounds. He was slowly running his fingers along the front of a red granite gravestone, getting emotional when they went over four special words.

****

Eighty-one years earlier, this spot was the scene of overwhelming grief. Thousands had arrived at the cemetery to mourn the tragic end of a precocious sporting talent. People had walked for hours to this out-of-the-way spot to pay their respects.As with today, when a nation struggles to comprehend the sudden loss of a special cricketer, in February 1933, Australia found it difficult to comprehend why such a mighty athlete, “our Archie Jackson”, had been taken. He was only 23.As police cordoned off the crowd at Field of Mars, six distraught Australian Test cricket team-mates took on the duty of pallbearers, picked up the casket and walked it through the cemetery grounds.At the front were Victor Richardson and Bill Woodfull. Behind them were Bill Ponsford, Don Bradman, Bert Oldfield and Stan McCabe. When they eventually arrived at the gravesite, Alan Kippax replaced McCabe, who had suddenly been taken ill.As the body was lowered, Reverend Sam McKibbin, who, due to the dying wishes of Archie, had travelled from Singleton for the burial address, said: “All over the British Empire there will be a sense of disappointment and loss today, as we lay beneath the sod the body, whose short but brilliant career started in such a blaze of glory and now ends in this sudden way. Words are but poor instruments to express the things we feel.”In the Referee newspaper that weekend, editor JC Davis wrote: “It is sad to realise that such a beautiful flower of the cricket field should pass almost just as it became a full bloom. And what a wonder bloom!”

Bradman described Jackson as “tall and slim, rather lethargic and graceful in his movements”

It had been the most trying of summers. Just a month earlier, the Bodyline series had become venomous. Woodfull and Oldfield had been hit during the Adelaide Test. The crowd had threatened to jump the fence. Now those who had been battered by Larwood and Co had lost their dear colleague to tuberculosis. Some found it hard to cope.Archie was not just loved by his fellow cricketers. He was admired by all who had met him in day-to-day life, or observed him when he had on the cricketing crèmes. A quiet, self-effacing character who grew up in the tough working-class waterside suburb of Balmain, he was humble, forever thinking of his fellow man.Like the rest of his impoverished family, he had it tough for considerable stretches of his short life. Alan Kippax and HV (Bert) Evatt, later to become leader of the Federal Parliament Labor Party, helped him when funds were short, always ensuring that his Balmain club membership was paid for and he had the required cricketing equipment.On the field, Jackson was a poet. He played cricket with a flourish. Daring. The word most commonly used to describe his batting was “elegant”. Bradman described him as “tall and slim, rather lethargic and graceful in his movements”.In his celebrated biography, David Frith described Archie as “the Keats of cricket”. Another delicate, romantic talent who, at 25, departed far too early, also from tuberculosis.Earlier on February 18, 1933, the Australian XI team had formed a guard of honour at Central Railway Station when the coffin arrived on the Brisbane Express. The Sydney Morning Herald described it as “a pathetic scene”.Then on to his parents’ house in Drummoyne, where the funeral procession began for Field of Mars – a brisk four-mile, hour-and-a-half walk away. The coffin went along Victoria Road and Lyons Road, with the crowd three or four deep virtually all the way.Jackson’s grave in the Field of Mars cemetery•Getty ImagesThe SMH reported: “Long before the hour appointed for the cortege to leave the house, crowds began to pour into Drummoyne from neighbouring suburbs. The funeral passed through densely packed streets. As it went by Gladesville Park, a number of young lads were playing Jackson’s favourite game. As soon as the cortege was sighted, play ceased, and was not resumed for a time.”Jackson was, after all, one of them. He had begun his first-grade career with the Balmain club when just 15 years and one month old. His biggest problem at that young age was not how to handle his mature cricketing opponents, all wanting to put this upstart in his spot, but his dangerous habit of sleepwalking. So concerned was his father that Archie would walk off the balcony of their original Balmain terrace, his bedroom door handle had to be tied up.When the teenager established himself as one of the mightiest of Sydney batting talents, his sleep patterns improved. Eventually Mr Jackson was able to untie the bedroom door.Representative cricket soon followed, and before he was 20, Archie was in the Australian team. There was no quiet initiation period.After his first Test innings, in February 1929, cricket writers were describing Archie as a “national hero”. Not surprising considering that it was a near-faultless innings of 164 against England at the Adelaide Oval. Even when advised by his batting partner, Bradman, to be careful in compiling his century, Jackson opted against inhibition. He instead hit the next ball from Larwood to the point boundary. The Members Stand stood as one. They stood again when he passed three figures.It again involved Larwood, who later wrote: “He cover-drove me to bring up his hundred… That ball was delivered as fast as any I had ever bowled previously. That glorious stroke has lived in my memory to this day for its ease and perfect timing. I am sure that few among the many thousands present sighted the ball as it raced to the boundary.”There was a darker side. When his innings was finally finished, Jackson was near exhaustion. Team-mate Stork Hendry said that Archie was limp when he returned to the rooms. “We had to mop him with cold towels,” Stork said. “Poor little devil.”From then on, ill-health blighted his career. He suffered badly after an operation to remove his tonsils, losing more than 6kg. He often had to withdraw from matches due to various issues, which included a bout of influenza brought about by being caught in a storm when crossing the Hawkesbury River once.

“Well Harold, it’s only a game, but what a grand one we’re having today! You know, you’ve hit me almost as many times as I’ve hit you! I wish you’d drop one a little off line occasionally”

Then before the NSW-Queensland match in Brisbane at the start of the 1931-32 season, Jackson collapsed and was rushed to hospital after coughing up blood in the dressing room.Jackson thought he had influenza, was discharged within a week, and returned to Sydney with the NSW team. The Australian Board of Control, concerned by the collapse, installed him at Bodington, a Red Cross sanatorium in the Blue Mountains, in the hope the problem could be traced.Then seeking treatment for psoriasis, Jackson went to the Calvary Hospital, Adelaide, in July 1932. A short time later an Adelaide physician sent a confidential report to the New South Wales Cricket Association that confirmed that Jackson had “pneumonary tuberculosis with fairly extensive involvement of the lungs”.The following year, Jackson collapsed again. This prompted him and his girlfriend, Phyllis Thomas, to announce their engagement. He also moved to Brisbane in the hope that warmer weather would improve his condition. It didn’t.At 12.15am on February 16, 1933 – a short time after Ponsford, Woodfull, Arthur Mailey, Len Darling, George Duckworth and England manger Plum Warner had visited him at the Ingarfield Private Hospital in Brisbane – Archibald Jackson died.Even those from opposing teams struggled to believe that such a talent had departed so early, and after just eight Test appearances, which involved 474 runs at 47.4.Larwood was one of many to admire Jackson’s mixture of beauty and bravado. He recalled in the foreword to Frith’s biography Jackson’s innings of 73 during the fifth Test of the 1930 series, at The Oval.Between glorious innings, Jackson was often seriously ill•PA Photos”He was taking quite a physical beating. As he came down the wicket to level a high spot or two, he said: “Well Harold, it’s only a game, but what a grand one we’re having today! I hope you’re enjoying our battle as much as those spectators seem to be. You know, you’ve hit me almost as many times as I’ve hit you! I wish you’d drop one a little off line occasionally.”Larwood also appreciated Jackson’s sportsmanship. “One of my most cherished possessions to this day is a personal telegram sent to me by Archie while undoubtedly a very sick boy in Brisbane; it congratulated me on my bowling in that controversial Test of 1933. At the time he must have been very close to meeting his Maker, but he was still conscious enough to remember an old friend.”Two years after his death when the NSW players arrived at the dressing room at the Brisbane Cricket Ground for their match against Queensland, they discovered a photograph of Archie on the dining room table, alongside a bowl of roses. It had been left there by his fiancée to mark the second anniversary of their engagement. The players, some in tears, bowed their heads in memory of a distinguished team-mate they never forgot.

****

On John Keats’ grave in the Protestant Cemetery in Rome are the words: “Here lies one whose name was writ in water.”On the other side of the world, the electrical storm had passed. The two women and their Jack Russell had long fled. The couch grass that covers the top of Archie’s grave was damp. Several weeds in the corners of an otherwise manicured grave drooped with droplets of rain.The only part of the gravestone, designed by former Test cricketer Tommy Andrews, that was dry, was right at the bottom.Where it says: “He played the game.”

India made to sweat in small chase

ESPNcricinfo staff06-Mar-2015A fit-again Mohammed Shami got rid of Dwayne Smith for 6 in the fifth over•Associated PressA huge mix-up with Chris Gayle left Marlon Samuels way short of his ground three overs later•Associated PressGayle got a couple of boundaries away, but one of his slogs found Mohit Sharma at deep square leg•Associated PressThen Denesh Ramdin was bowled for a duck as West Indies slumped to 35 for 4 in the 10th over•Associated PressIt was the perfect situation for Ravindra Jadeja and R Ashwin to control. They took three wickets between them•Getty ImagesJason Holder was West Indies’ only source of resistance and his 64-ball 57 pushed West Indies to 182•Associated PressIndia’s chase started poorly as their openers fell when in single digits•ICCVirat Kohli looked good for his 33 but got out trying to pull one from outside off•Getty ImagesThe short ball was a useful weapon for West Indies as well on a fast WACA track•Getty ImagesAjinkya Rahane was dismissed 15 runs later, leaving India at 78 for 4•Getty ImagesThe gamble of bowling Dwayne Smith fetched the wicket of Suresh Raina for 22 and India were 107 for 5•AFPMarlon Samuels took a catch at deep square leg to remove Ravindra Jadeja with India 48 runs away•Associated PressBut MS Dhoni struck a 56-ball 45 to guide India to an eighth successive World Cup win•AFP

Game
Register
Service
Bonus